Everyday clinical practice includes clinical examination, which is highly subjective as an assessment. In many cases this evaluation happens to be so personal that even when recorded in the Urologist's personal notes it does not help at all in the next clinical examination. There have been lots of attempts aiming at objective evaluation systems but not many of them are widely accepted. Two highly experienced colleagues will reveal useful and reliable assessment methods; the first one in Urinary disorders and the second one in Andrology.